Spa 2016 Replay Raikkonen

Find out the full Practice results for all the drivers for the Formula 1 2016 Belgian Grand Prix on BBC Sport, including who had the fastest laps in each practice session, up to three qualifying.

Ferrari team boss Maurizio Arrivabene has suggested that Kimi Raikkonen’s bad getaway at the start of the may have been driver error, but the 2007 Formula 1 world champion insists he followed the correct procedure. Raikkonen had qualified second on the grid at Monza – his best starting position of the season – and expectations were high that he would challenge polesitter Lewis Hamilton for the race lead at the first corner of the race.

Getting ahead of Hamilton at Turn 1 was Ferrari’s only realistic chance of stopping the reigning champion from escaping at the head of the pack But when the lights went out at the start of the race, Raikkonen’s car went into anti-stall mode and he failed to move off the line until the majority of the field had passed. Speaking after the race, Ferrari’s team principal, Arrivabene suggested that Raikkonen had triggered the poor start himself, although the Italian was keen point out that he had not seen conclusive proof from the car’s telemetry. He said: “Looking at the moment on the images on television, it looks like he was struggling a bit, or messing a bit, with a finger to follow the procedure.

But, doing an accusation before having the data is wrong. “What I have to say is that being positive he had a fantastic qualifying and today into the race, starting from that position, he was doing very, very good overtaking and we were happy. “If you ask me what was the ideal situation, the ideal situation was to see Kimi passing first at the first curve. But Raikkonen insisted he had not made a mistake to cause the car to go into anti-stall. He said: “As far I understand I did the correct thing, but we can see there’s a problem with the second clutch. It was not in the correct place.

Pressman 6th edition McGraw- Hill 2.Software Engineering Somerville 7th edition 1 • UNIT 2 SYLLABUS• Process models: The waterfall model, Incremental process models, Evolutionary process models, The Unified process.• Software Requirements: Functional and non-functional requirements, User requirements, System requirements, Interface specification, the software requirements document. Software Engineering B.Tech IT/II Sem-II Term: 2008-2009 Unit-2 PPT SLIDESText Books:1.Software Engineering, A practitioner’s approach Roger s. Example of srs in software engineering. Software engineering • 1.

I’m pretty sure I put it correct as always. I don’t know. “Whatever it was it triggered the anti-stall and after a few seconds I was in last place. I’ve not had anything like this before.

“Whatever the reason is we have to make sure we understand it correctly 100 per cent, and if we need to make changes we do the right things. “After that we did the best we could. I’m obviously quite disappointed. When you start in second place and end up last by the first corner it is not ideal. The weekend was good apart from that issue.” Arrivabene added that despite the disappointment of not challenging Hamilton for the race win, there were positives to take away from Ferrari’s home race. He said: “We have to be happy.

We have a driver who is second [and] we are still second in the constructors’ championship. Fine.” Raikkonen’s second place on the grid was his best qualifying position since the Chinese Grand Prix in 2013, but his dreadful start immediately undid all that good work at the start of the race. F1 introduced a ahead of last month’s at Spa that handed control of the standing race starts over the driver and prevented the teams informing their drivers of the optimum clutch position for the perfect getaway. The introduction of the new rules led to speculation that unpredictable starts would be come commonplace as the drivers struggled to adapt the change.

Nico Rosberg was the most high profile driver to lose out in Spa when he fell from second to sixth off the line, but Raikkonen also got a poor start at the rear of the field and dropped behind both McLaren cars – who had started last – at the initial launch. Raikkonen technically maintained his 16th place – where he had started following a gearbox issue in qualifying – but only because Nico Hulkenberg and Carlos Sainz had failed to take the start. The next race in Singapore does not feature such a long run to the first corner as at Monza, but Raikkonen will need to work on improving his starts before then if the Finnish driver is to capitalise on his recent. I’m actually a bit confused. Don’t see how it could be down to the new procedure as all the driver has to do is decide his own bite point.

Get it wrong and bog down or wheel spin. Why I’m confused is his car didn’t move at all, not one centimetre, just straight in to anti stall so it couldn’t be a result of the bite point being wrong.

Could have been a result of not being able to receive step by step instructions (set this mode, press that button, pull that lever) and just plain stuffed up the settings. Or, could have been a fault.

It’s like Ferrari are making these little sabotages to Raikkonen’s car that seems like it was either his error entirely (Anti-stall, Torque map) or just plain horrible luck (MGU-K failure, Tire blanket). Then there’s Arrivabene’s post-race comments slightly hinting some favoritism for Vettel. But that’s just some random conspiracy theory. It’s just frustrating seeing all is well with Vettel and consistently delivering while Raikkonen, despite the evident race pace, is made silly with the string of disappointing results due to these random issues. It wasn’t even like this during his Lotus days where he performed well considering the car wasn’t on par with Red Bull or McLaren (2012) but it was reliable during the race. Things just haven’t been smooth ever since he returned to Ferrari. Just hope that next year things get better for Raikkonen.